Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-3632QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1320 days newer than Core i7-3632QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3632QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3632QM - 171 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3632QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3632QM | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |