Buy on Amazon
CA$64.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than Core i7-2960XM - 80 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-2960XM - 51 vs 55 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
80
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$64.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2960XM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
