Buy on Amazon
CA$380
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1968 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than Core i7-2675QM - 53 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
53
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$380
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Processor (YD170XBCAEWOF)
Buy for CA$380 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
