Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4378 days newer than Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Deathloop than Core i7-2600S - 198 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 32 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$564.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
21.355311355311354%
Multi-Core
1811
10.517451652244613%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |