Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 148% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8300 - 582 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - CA$83.46 vs CA$609.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700K - CA$0.36 vs CA$1.05 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
582
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.05/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$609.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$609.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
235
40%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |