Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i7-14700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$481.99 vs CA$813.94
- Up to 36% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-14900KF - CA$5.95 vs CA$9.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i7-14700F - 87 vs 81 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
81
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$481.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$481.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.36/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$813.94
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$813.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |