Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1563 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 3600XT - 234 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$693.64 vs CA$899.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$2.6 vs CA$4.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 32 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$693.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$693.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2486 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
209
89.31623931623932%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.3/FPS
60.465116279069775%
Price, CA$
CA$899
77%
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1704
54.826254826254825%
Multi-Core
7222
34.321832525425336%
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |