Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 315 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900F - 673 vs 657 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - CA$288.99 vs CA$1414.54
- Up to 79% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-12700 - CA$0.44 vs CA$2.1 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
673
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.1/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$1414.54
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,414.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10773 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$288.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$288.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10772 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |