Buy on Amazon
CA$383.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 110 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - CA$150.0 vs CA$383.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700 - CA$1.39 vs CA$3.49 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.49/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$383.99
39%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, BX8070110700
Buy for CA$383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
108
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$150
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 3.6GHz Wraith Stealth 2MB L2 Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for CA$150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
