Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1907 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$196.7 vs CA$517.62
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-14700F - CA$1.44 vs CA$3.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600K - 159 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 28 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
137
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.26/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$517.62
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$517.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
6 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |