Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than FX-6300 - 732 vs 673 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - CA$59.57 vs CA$218.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-9600K - CA$0.09 vs CA$0.3 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
732
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |