Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 2364 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i7-3770K - 198 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - CA$214.0 vs CA$325.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-9600 - CA$1.3 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600 - 8 vs 6 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
79%
Price, CA$
CA$325
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
165
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |