Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2227 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G1620 - 181 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$36.89 vs CA$153.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-9400F - CA$0.21 vs CA$0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13680 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
178
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13679 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |