Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 424 days older than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7722 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
No | Overclockable | No |