Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$210.0 vs CA$678.98
- Up to 68% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900KF - CA$1.04 vs CA$3.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-8400 - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
202
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.26/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$678.98
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$678.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |