Buy on Amazon
CA$210
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 1658 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - CA$210.0 vs CA$408.98
- Up to 42% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - CA$1.98 vs CA$3.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-8400 - 120 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
106
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores Up to 4.0 Ghz Lga 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11028 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.41/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$408.98
51%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor with AMD 3D V-Cache Technology
Buy for CA$408.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
