Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1577 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than FX-9590 - 225 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$189.49 vs CA$549.41
- Up to 67% better value when playing Death Stranding than FX-9590 - CA$0.84 vs CA$2.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
225
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$189.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$189.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2123 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
214
95.11111111111111%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.57/FPS
32.68482490272373%
Price, CA$
CA$549.41
34%
Buy for CA$549.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |