Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$250.0 vs CA$463.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-11900F - CA$0.75 vs CA$1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-7400T - 377 vs 335 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
335
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
377
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$463
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$463 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |