Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-7300HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than Core i5-7300HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-7300HQ - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1163.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,163.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |