Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 725 days newer than Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Core i5-6600T - 178 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
175
98.31460674157303%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$244.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2527 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
83.69950389794471%
Multi-Core
3223
41.06255573958466%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |