Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2084 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 9% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11400 - CA$1.84 vs CA$2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-6600T - 140 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - CA$156.99 vs CA$244.5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
133
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$244.5
64%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.03/FPS
90.64039408866996%
Price, CA$
CA$156.99
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$156.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
60.87628865979381%
Multi-Core
3223
44.15068493150685%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |