Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 728 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than EPYC 7551P - 120 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 64 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$128.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$128.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Skylake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |