Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - CA$56.28 vs CA$129.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-650 - 114 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$56.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74379 minutes ago
Buy for CA$129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
449
31.223922114047287%
Multi-Core
916
15.927664753955833%
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |