Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - CA$56.28 vs CA$161.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10400 - CA$0.39 vs CA$1.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-650 - 162 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
144
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$56.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$56.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3241 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$161.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$161.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |