Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2084 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - CA$158.51 vs CA$263.96
- Up to 37% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i5-11600KF - CA$0.79 vs CA$1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i5-6400 - 212 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
201
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12759 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$263.96
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$263.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |