Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Core i5-540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1061 days newer than Core i5-540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-540M - 107 vs 106 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-540M doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-540M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |