Buy on Amazon
CA$350
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1965 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - CA$350.0 vs CA$543.99
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 88 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-4690K - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor (6M Cache, Upto 3.9 GHz) FC-LGA12C
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10920X 3.5 GHz 12-Core LGA 2066 Processor
Buy for CA$543.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
1287
76.83582089552239%
Multi-Core
3631
31.994008282668073%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
