Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2479 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-4690K - 206 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - CA$84.99 vs CA$350.0
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74634 minutes ago
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
1287
88.51444291609354%
Multi-Core
3631
81.19409660107334%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |