Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 555 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 239 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - CA$59.57 vs CA$122.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-4690 - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$122.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$122.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
229
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |