Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4590T is 1423 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590T
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - 123 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-4590T - CA$49.99 vs CA$86.38
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4590T - CA$0.42 vs CA$0.7 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$86.38
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$86.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
118
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |