Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570 is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than FX-8320 - 228 vs 208 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-4570 - CA$111.14 vs CA$139.6
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-4570 - CA$0.53 vs CA$0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
228
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
86.88524590163935%
Price, CA$
CA$139.6
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$139.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48120 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
91.22807017543859%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |