Buy on Amazon
CA$108
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 2165 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Performs up to 1% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G4900 - 156 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 54 vs 77 Watts
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
99.35897435897436%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Core i5-3550
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
96.40062597809077%
Multi-Core
1051
55.4324894514768%
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
