Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - CA$327.18 vs CA$498.98
- Up to 5% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - CA$2.97 vs CA$3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 45% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-3450S - 160 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
110
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$327.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$327.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.12/FPS
95%
Price, CA$
CA$498.98
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$498.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |