Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - CA$195.52 vs CA$417.98
- Up to 37% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14600KF - CA$1.67 vs CA$2.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450S - 158 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
74%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$195.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$195.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14544 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.65/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$417.98
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$417.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |