Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2283 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-2467M - 121 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2467M - 16 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |