Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 795 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - CA$289.0 vs CA$416.89
- Up to 29% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-12900K - CA$2.95 vs CA$4.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Core i5-14400F - 101 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
98
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$289
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8151 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
101
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.13/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$416.89
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$416.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |