Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4971 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Core i7-875K - 218 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$112.0 vs CA$326.75
- Up to 61% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.59 vs CA$1.5 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.5/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$326.75
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$326.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
190
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |