Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3450 - 271 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$208.96 vs CA$323.93
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.99 vs CA$1.2 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
271
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
82%
Price, CA$
CA$323.93
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$323.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
212
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$208.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$208.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |