Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10600K - 255 vs 245 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$234.99 vs CA$323.55
- Up to 24% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.96 vs CA$1.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
255
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$323.55
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$323.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
245
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$234.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$234.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |