Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than Core i7-9700F - 73 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$309.99 vs CA$2360.48
- Up to 84% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13400F - CA$5.08 vs CA$32.34 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
73
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$32.34/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$2360.48
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,360.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
61
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$309.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |