Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than Core i5-8600K - 97 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$218.88 vs CA$2238.3
- Up to 89% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-13400F - CA$2.46 vs CA$23.08 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
97
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$23.08/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$2238.3
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,238.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
89
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |