Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6800K - 187 vs 175 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$214.29 vs CA$319.3
- Up to 29% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-13400 - CA$1.22 vs CA$1.71 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$319.3
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
175
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |