Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4690 - 148 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$122.99 vs CA$319.3
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400 - CA$0.97 vs CA$2.16 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.16/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$319.3
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
127
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$122.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$122.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |