Buy on Amazon
CA$319.3
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 411% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 286 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$36.09 vs CA$319.3
- Up to 43% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i5-13400 - CA$0.64 vs CA$1.12 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
286
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$319.3
11%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-13400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) 20MB Cache, up to 4.6 GHz
Buy for CA$319.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
56
19%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
