Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100F - 125 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - CA$145.0 vs CA$409.85
- Up to 58% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12600 - CA$1.37 vs CA$3.28 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.28/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$409.85
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$409.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |