Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 713 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$421.75 vs CA$463.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700F - CA$2.12 vs CA$2.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-12600 - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 28 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
199
95.21531100478468%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$421.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$421.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44025 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
95.4954954954955%
Price, CA$
CA$463.99
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$463.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44025 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Single-Core
2371
85.44144144144144%
Multi-Core
9721
56.08700669282253%
Intel Core i5-12600 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |