Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7400T - 194 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$250.0 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600K - CA$1.52 vs CA$1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.57/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
165
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |