Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10105F - 224 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$96.0 vs CA$319.02
- Up to 69% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-11600 - CA$0.44 vs CA$1.42 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
224
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$319.02
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11060 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |