Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2387 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8370 - 443 vs 373 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - CA$220.0 vs CA$287.8
- Up to 9% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11500 - CA$0.59 vs CA$0.65 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
443
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$287.8
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$287.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
373
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |