Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4018 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon W3680 - 163 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3070 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Xeon W3680 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |